Milford/Dart Tunnel Submission

-
Upper Hollyford Valley 

I was a bit pushed for time, but I hope it is accepted. My submission:

I strongly oppose this application for the following reasons:

1.    The application has been approved in principle despite the fact there is insufficient information to support it. Why should this application get preferential treatment?

2.    The application has huge implications for the immediate environment and although the tunnel will be built within a National Park it will not benefit the majority of New Zealanders who would visit the area.

3.    There doesn’t appear to be enough funding to maintain the boardwalk on Stewart Island’s Rakiura track (promoted as one of the great walks of New Zealand) and if this tunnel project receives approval it will indicate a bias for the wealthy elite over average New Zealanders and tourists. Our National Parks should be managed in an inclusive way.

4.    The environmental consequences of the tunnel construction could be enormous and without proper analysis we will not know the true impact.

5.    The construction itself will take many years and have a negative impact on all those visiting the area over that time, including restriction of access.

6.    There appears to be no guarantee around who is responsible for managing any long-lasting environmental effects. Maritime New Zealand is currently responsible for managing any accident involving offshore drilling and the costs absorbed by the taxpayer. Will DoC be responsible for any lasting environmental effects of the tunnel?

7.    The current transport infrastructure is adequate and when compared to similar areas internationally, travel times are not excessive. I could predict more travel bottlenecks if travel times are shortened through the use of a tunnel. We should encourage longer stays in New Zealand and the existing route to Milford Sound, through rural New Zealand, is widely admired for its own beauty.

8.    This project goes against the philosophy and values of our National Parks and ignores the fact that one of the determining factors for attaining UNESCO World Heritage Status is that the environment has not suffered greatly by human intrusion. 
  
I hope that my submission will receive due consideration because the approval of the tunnel proposal sets a dangerous precedent for the future exploitation of our National Parks for the benefit of an elite few.

Yours sincerely... 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The US is actually unique for not valuing life!

-
Image
"...that’s what sets America apart from every other country; we value life. That is what makes us unique.” - Sarah Sanders There is a high level of delusion operating in the White House. The stream of mistruths that come out of President Trump and Sarah Sanders' mouths are clearly blatant lies but millions of US citizens believe them. With daily diets of Fox News and living in a very insular culture , there is little that challenges these false perceptions of US "greatness".  When comparing the United States of America with most other developed nations it becomes clear that it probably places less value on life than most and doesn't compare well with many developing countries too: If the US really valued life then it would abolish the death penalty, it is the only Western Country that executes people under law ( 23 people were executed in 2018 ).  If the US really valued life then it would have an equitable and universal health care system. The cur
Read more

NZ, the Unethical Investor

-
Image
New Zealand is not wealthy in a global sense and our Government's investments would barely rate against many international corporates but our Crown Financial Institutions, like our $19 billion Superannuation Fund, do have a global impact. It is important that our money has a positive influence on the world and that we use reasonable diligence to ensure our investments are well vetted. Norway has a similar population to New Zealand yet it has taken a far more responsible approach to how it has invested its oil riches. Norway uses a Council of Ethics to closely evaluate its state pension fund investments against strict ethical guidelines. The guidelines are based on two premises. The first being that future generations will benefit from current oil wealth and that the return from invested funds are contingent on sustainable development in an economic, environmental and social sense. The second is a commitment that the fund should not allow a risk of investment that could contribu
Read more

ANZAC DAY REFLECTIONS

-
Image
I find ANZAC Day creates a dilemma for me, consequently I rarely attend dawn parades. I fully support people recognising the human cost of wars and remembering family members who lost their lives on battlefields. A grandfather of mine fought in WW1 and was gassed in the French trenches, which compromised his health for the rest of his life. His wife (my grandmother) lost her young brother in WW2. The sacrifices and human costs of war should never be minimalised. However, while speeches at ANZAC parades are full of statements promoting peace and the futility of war, those who campaign hardest for peace, promote nonviolence and call for weapons reductions are often treated like criminals. Anyone who dares to mention our own war crimes or that of our allies are generally shut down or demonised. It has become a sort of cultural heresy to question the reputation and glorification of the ANZACs.  I would love to see greater balance in how we talk about war and properly recognise those who ha
Read more